Justice Akhtar returns to judges committee as CJP Afridi reconstitutes key panel



Supreme Courts Justice Munib Akhtar (left), Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Yahya Afridi and Justice Mansoor Ali Shah. — SC website
Supreme Court docket’s Justice Munib Akhtar (left), Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Yahya Afridi and Justice Mansoor Ali Shah. — SC web site 

Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Yahya Afridi on Saturday included Justice Munib Akhtar again to the SC Apply and Process Committee which was established for the aim of fixing instances and forming benches.

The reconstitution of the three-member key panel got here after Justice Afridi’s swearing in ceremony as Pakistan’s thirtieth chief justice after Justice Qazi Faez Isa’s retirement. 

In response to a notification, the chief justice will head the particular bench shaped by the judges committee underneath the SC (Apply and Process Act), 2023. He additionally included senior puisne decide Justice Mansoor Ali Shah and Justice Akhtar to the judges’ committee.

On September 20, President Asif Ali Zardari accepted the Supreme Court docket (Apply and Process) Modification Ordinance 2024, permitting the CJP to select any decide of the apex court docket to be the third member of the physique.

Quickly after the president’s approval, then-CJP Isa exercised his powers underneath amended regulation and appointed Justice Amin-Ud-Din Khan to the judges’ committee, changing Justice Akhtar.

The ordinance, promulgated in September this 12 months, empowers the chief justice to appoint a decide of his selection within the committee that constitutes the benches. As per the ordinance, the physique will comprise the chief justice, the senior puisne and any decide nominated by the CJP.

Following Justice Akhtar’s removing, Justice Shah wrote a letter to the secretary of the Supreme Court docket, expressing issues over the ordinance.

Justice Mansoor, in his letter, famous that no causes got as to why the second senior most decide, Justice Akhtar, was faraway from the composition of the committee. “Moreover, no causes got why the following senior most decide was ignored and as a substitute, the fourth senior most decide was nominated as a member of the Committee.”

“Such unlucky cherry choosing and undemocratic show of one-man present are exactly what the Act tried to discourage and replace-a stance that was upheld by the Full Court docket Bench of this Court docket in Raja Amer,” he wrote.

Justice Shah had additionally refused to turn into a member of particular bench, stating he was unable to take part within the bench over his issues concerning amendments to the observe regulation by way of ordinance.

In his October 23 letter, the senior decide additionally made his participation within the particular bench conditional, saying that “till the total court docket bench decided the constitutional validity of the promulgation of the ordinance in addition to of the amendments made thereby or the judges of the SC resolve to behave upon these amendments in a full court docket assembly pending adjudication upon the constitutionality thereof, or the sooner committee comprising the HCJP and two senior most judges is restored, I can’t take part in particular benches shaped by the brand new committee and can solely attend sittings of the common benches to listen to the instances of abnormal litigants within the bigger public curiosity.”

Responding to Justice Shah’s letter, then-CJP Isa had mentioned legally he couldn’t be requested about why he nominated a decide because the committee’s third member. Nonetheless, the then chief justice had offered the explanations for his motion, saying he did it as a result of he “at all times advocated accountability and transparency”.

Furthermore, the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) was additionally reconstituted with CJP Afridi changing into the chairman. Earlier, the newly-appointed prime decide was not a part of the SJC.

The council additionally contains Justice Mansoor, Justice Akhtar and chief justices of the excessive courts.